Comments on: Book Review: The Lost Symbol

By: VINIK

VINIK — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:22:55 +0000

I L PREFER WATCHING D MOVIE OF DIS BOOK INSTEAD OF READING DIS BUK

By: meeta

meeta — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:27:23 +0000

a.u could have written an even more sarcastic n vitriolic review.
b. if the novel is superficial so is your review.
c.send me deception point…not links.
d.btw how busy are you…to have been so busy…if you understand…what i mean…

By: Rajat Arora

Rajat Arora — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 17:30:22 +0000

You talking about scientists? These days, even when someone googles for something, he calls it research!!
Interestingly, even Robert Langdon makes this point in The Lost Symbol.

By: Rajat Arora

Rajat Arora — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 17:28:58 +0000

And Deception Point was one hell of a book. Nobody talks about it.

By: Rajat Arora

Rajat Arora — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 17:28:31 +0000

Ask the Bollywood producers.

By: Rajat Arora

Rajat Arora — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 17:28:13 +0000

Any sequel? Or any sequel by Dan Brown?

By: Rajat Arora

Rajat Arora — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 17:27:37 +0000

For that, this book might be your best bet!

By: rosostrov.ru

rosostrov.ru — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:22:24 +0000

Why do scientists call it research when looking for something new?

By: Freya

Freya — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:03:17 +0000

Oh I figured out Dan Brown after finishing Angels and Demons and The Da Vinci Code. So, I am not bothering to read this one. I don’t know why people were sleepless outside the book shops. He is so duh. And Robert Langdon is not even sexy!

By: Phoenixritu

Phoenixritu — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 04:08:11 +0000

So he seems to be drying out! There goes another writer — gone too rusty. Why do people stick to the same old formula?